39th Chaos Communication Congress Videos

(media.ccc.de)

279 points | by Jommi 5 hours ago

8 comments

  • neiman 5 hours ago
    Where were people's favourite lectures?

    I attended 7 talks.

    My favourite talk by far was hacking the GPG. Brilliant, really: https://media.ccc.de/v/39c3-to-sign-or-not-to-sign-practical...

    The "In-house electronics manufacturing from scratch" was a very inspiring talk: https://media.ccc.de/v/39c3-in-house-electronics-manufacturi...

    The rest were less good for me personally. Either over-dramatic and shallow (with a sexy-sounding topic) or too procedural in topics I'm not an expert in.

  • Fnoord 2 hours ago
    I haven't seen all of them (which I wanted to see) yet, I had a lot of fun with various talks. Thus far, my favourite one was hands down [1], and I can explain why. I am not at all good with hardware, nor hardware designing i.e. I'm not the target audience for this talk.

    However, the talk was beautiful. It went quick, was informative, good slides, very respectful Q&A (comms and quality-wise), and it had a message of DIY _and_ inspiring hope. It is easy to criticize X or say we need to do better with Y. These guys are doing it, and their journey and findings is completely open source (even though there was substantial financial risk involved). The hacker spirit 101.

    [1] https://media.ccc.de/v/39c3-in-house-electronics-manufacturi...

  • kherud 4 hours ago
    One interesting detail: In previous years, Joscha Bach gave a talk on AI, consciousness, and related topics (see e.g. [0]). A similar talk was planned for this year as well, but after emails between him and Epstein were made public (see his comment on this in [1]), his talk was canceled. Instead, there appears to have been an event that critically addressed the situation [2]. Unfortunately it was not recorded. Did anyone attend? A discussion between Joscha and his critics would have been really interesting.

    [0] https://media.ccc.de/v/38c3-self-models-of-loving-grace

    [1] https://joscha.substack.com/p/on-the-jeffrey-epstein-affair

    [2] https://events.ccc.de/congress/2025/hub/en/event/detail/tech...

    • anotheryou 3 hours ago
      Well that discussion talk is not an open discourse about the situation...

      He quoted what he believed was scientific evidence in a private conversation that became public, has comments on fashism being efficient are clearly anti-facist and believed to observe a gender stereotype. No matter if the facts were true, it should be possible to discuss such things (especially those you think are facts) in private without getting canceled. Even if they would play in to the hand of racism or sexism if made as public statements.

      I found his appology a bit weak, but I also don't see his offense, despite the messages in public being offensive and possibly harmful.

      • viccis 1 hour ago
        I think people have little patience lately for tolerating private discussion they find objectionable with Epstein.
    • looperhacks 49 minutes ago
      Assembly events like [2] are not recorded because they are largely self-organized and barely moderated (if at all).
    • Alconicon 3 hours ago
      Urgh wtf...

      This meta discussion synopsis "Tech-Transcendentalism as Hypermodern Myth and Neofeudal Ideology [all creatures welcome]" feels like reading a rabit hole of a mountain.

      I would have loved another talk from Joscha, the critisism is weirdly ignorant.

    • weinzierl 4 hours ago
      To add some context and to spare readers who, like me, know nothing about Joscha Bach and only little about Epstein from having to go through all the linked material:

      The allegations do not appear to involve abuse or moral complicity with Epstein. Instead, they seem to focus on emails Bach exchanged with Epstein concerning IQ, race, and possibly sex. Bach denies these allegations of racism and sexism.

      That is at least how I understand the material based on the provided links.

    • walls 3 hours ago
      "All of the people I know who were friends with this sociopathic child-trafficking pedophile told me he was reformed now" is certainly something to put out there.
  • fbias 2 hours ago
    I can’t not see Catbert in the video player iconography. Someone tell me they did this intentionally.
    • st_goliath 2 hours ago
      The icon is supposed to represent one of those waving cat figurines: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maneki-neko

      It has some long tradition placing those visibly on the podium. As the story goes, the idea is that you can immediately see if the video stream freezes up (because the cat in the video suddenly stops waving). You wouldn't immediately catch that in between talks (when you have some time to fix the issue) if the camera was just pointed at an empty stage with no movement. I think at 30C3 or so, I saw one that was placed so that it would repeatedly knock on the microphone as well.

      Anyway, the waving cat has become a bit of a meme by itself and mascot of the VOC, hence also the (animated) icon in video player.

      • fbias 1 hour ago
        Thank you both!
    • ximm 2 hours ago
      It is a Maneki-neko (beckoning cat / Winkekatze). The video team started putting them on podiums so they could see when a stream was frozen. So it became kind of a mascot.
  • blakesterz 5 hours ago
    • teroshan 4 hours ago
      Transcript of the speech on his blog: https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/01/39c3/#the-new-coalition

      An excerpt:

      > I assume you've spotted the pattern by now: the US trade representative has forced every one of its trading partners to adopt anticircumvention law, to facilitate the extraction of their own people's data and money by American firms. But of course, that only raises a further question: Why would every other country in the world agree to let America steal its own people's money and data, and block its domestic tech sector from making interoperable products that would prevent this theft?

      > Here's an anecdote that unravels this riddle: many years ago, in the years before Viktor Orban rose to power, I used to guest-lecture at a summer PhD program in political science at Budapest's Central European University. And one summer, after I'd lectured to my students about anticircumvention law, one of them approached me.

      > They had been the information minister of a Central American nation during the CAFTA negotiations, and one day, they'd received a phone-call from their trade negotiator, calling from the CAFTA bargaining table. The negotiator said, "You know how you told me not to give the Americans anticircumvention under any circumstances? Well, they're saying that they won't take our coffee unless we give them anticircumvention. And I'm sorry, but we just can't lose the US coffee market. Our economy would collapse. So we're going to give them anticircumvention. I'm really sorry."

      > That's it. That's why every government in the world allowed US Big Tech companies to declare open season on their people's private data and ready cash.

      > The alternative was tariffs. Well, I don't know if you've heard, but we've got tariffs now!

      > I mean, if someone threatens to burn your house down unless you follow their orders, and then they burn your house down anyway, you don't have to keep following their orders. So…Happy Liberation Day?

    • divan 3 hours ago
      I shared this link on my personal FB page couple of times and it was automatically removed within seconds.
      • crtasm 2 hours ago
        I imagine it will be uploaded to the youtube channel soon: https://www.youtube.com/@mediacccde
      • sneak 3 hours ago
        Then why continue to donate time and attention to censorship platforms? Having a Facebook account is completely optional.
        • divan 1 hour ago
          Network effects, obviously.
          • aweiher 55 minutes ago
            I’d argue that what you're experiencing isn't the Network Effect anymore, but rather Vendor Lock-in.

            The Network Effect implies the platform gets better for you as more people join. If they are deleting your content, the network is no longer serving you—it’s just holding you hostage. This is enshitification as it best. (this ironie with a cory doctorow link)

            At this stage, it’s just a walled garden. Staying because 'everyone is here' while being silenced is learned helplessness.

            You're voluntarily staying in a walled garden that refuses to let you speak.

            But: The door is wide open, you can go.

      • blurbleblurble 3 hours ago
        Wild.
    • yunnpp 1 hour ago
      Precisely the first video I started downloading and I didn't even realize it was from Cory.

      It carries even more weight now that "post-American" is coming from...an American. This guy stands for his ideals, I envy such resolve.

  • ChrisArchitect 3 hours ago
    Some popular selections with discussion so far:

    Bluetooth Headphone Jacking: A Key to Your Phone [video]

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46453204

    Hacking Washing Machines [video]

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46428496

    Escaping containment: A security analysis of FreeBSD jails [video]

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46436828

    All my Deutschlandtickets gone: Fraud at an industrial scale [video]

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46411930

  • TheCraiggers 3 hours ago
    [flagged]